SCORING WEIGHT AUDIT
Attribution across the last 120 scored ticks, cross-checked against 220 resolved calls (30d). Suggested weights compare each signal’s realized P&L per aligned call to the cross-signal baseline.
CONFIDENCE GATE OVERLAY
conf 0.58 · score 2.00 · agree 3 · auto-tune on · last run 07:39:20AUTO-TUNE RECALIBRATION LOG
50 runs · marker timestamps match the charts above- Sep 2007:39:20marker 2026-09-20T07:39:20.523Z0.55→0.58+0.03tightenn=155 · hit 57.4% · Brier 0.354 · band 0.50–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.58 — Brier 0.354 no better than a coin flip (n=155)
- Sep 2007:39:20marker 2026-09-20T07:39:20.482Z0.55→0.58+0.03tightenn=155 · hit 57.4% · Brier 0.354 · band 0.50–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.58 — Brier 0.354 no better than a coin flip (n=155)
- Sep 2007:39:20marker 2026-09-20T07:39:20.454Z0.55→0.58+0.03tightenn=155 · hit 57.4% · Brier 0.354 · band 0.50–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.58 — Brier 0.354 no better than a coin flip (n=155)
- Sep 2007:39:20marker 2026-09-20T07:39:20.435Z0.55→0.58+0.03tightenn=155 · hit 57.4% · Brier 0.354 · band 0.50–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.58 — Brier 0.354 no better than a coin flip (n=155)
- Sep 2007:39:20marker 2026-09-20T07:39:20.430Z0.55→0.58+0.03tightenn=155 · hit 57.4% · Brier 0.354 · band 0.50–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.58 — Brier 0.354 no better than a coin flip (n=155)
- Sep 2007:39:20marker 2026-09-20T07:39:20.421Z0.55→0.58+0.03tightenn=155 · hit 57.4% · Brier 0.354 · band 0.50–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.58 — Brier 0.354 no better than a coin flip (n=155)
- Sep 2007:39:20marker 2026-09-20T07:39:20.400Z0.55→0.58+0.03tightenn=155 · hit 57.4% · Brier 0.354 · band 0.50–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.58 — Brier 0.354 no better than a coin flip (n=155)
- Sep 2007:39:20marker 2026-09-20T07:39:20.394Z0.55→0.58+0.03tightenn=155 · hit 57.4% · Brier 0.354 · band 0.50–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.58 — Brier 0.354 no better than a coin flip (n=155)
- Sep 2007:39:20marker 2026-09-20T07:39:20.365Z0.55→0.58+0.03tightenn=155 · hit 57.4% · Brier 0.354 · band 0.50–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.58 — Brier 0.354 no better than a coin flip (n=155)
- Sep 2007:39:20marker 2026-09-20T07:39:20.364Z0.55→0.58+0.03tightenn=155 · hit 57.4% · Brier 0.354 · band 0.50–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.58 — Brier 0.354 no better than a coin flip (n=155)
- Sep 2007:39:20marker 2026-09-20T07:39:20.334Z0.55→0.58+0.03tightenn=155 · hit 57.4% · Brier 0.354 · band 0.50–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.58 — Brier 0.354 no better than a coin flip (n=155)
- Sep 2007:39:20marker 2026-09-20T07:39:20.269Z0.55→0.58+0.03tightenn=155 · hit 57.4% · Brier 0.354 · band 0.50–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.58 — Brier 0.354 no better than a coin flip (n=155)
- Sep 2005:39:05marker 2026-09-20T05:39:05.883Z0.59→0.62+0.03tightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.50–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.62 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 2003:39:05marker 2026-09-20T03:39:05.699Z0.56→0.59+0.03tightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.50–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.59 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 2001:38:32marker 2026-09-20T01:38:32.279Z0.55→0.58+0.03tightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.50–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.58 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 2001:38:32marker 2026-09-20T01:38:32.247Z0.55→0.58+0.03tightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.50–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.58 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 2001:38:32marker 2026-09-20T01:38:32.096Z0.55→0.58+0.03tightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.50–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.58 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 2001:38:32marker 2026-09-20T01:38:32.094Z0.55→0.58+0.03tightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.50–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.58 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 2001:38:32marker 2026-09-20T01:38:32.073Z0.55→0.58+0.03tightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.50–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.58 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 2001:38:32marker 2026-09-20T01:38:32.021Z0.55→0.58+0.03tightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.50–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.58 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 2001:38:32marker 2026-09-20T01:38:32.009Z0.55→0.58+0.03tightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.50–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.58 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 2001:38:32marker 2026-09-20T01:38:32.007Z0.55→0.58+0.03tightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.50–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.58 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 2001:38:31marker 2026-09-20T01:38:31.585Z0.55→0.58+0.03tightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.50–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.58 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 1923:38:06marker 2026-09-19T23:38:06.135Z0.80→0.80no changetightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.58–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.80 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 1911:15:03marker 2026-09-19T11:15:03.151Z0.80→0.80no changetightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.58–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.80 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 1911:15:03marker 2026-09-19T11:15:03.114Z0.80→0.80no changetightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.58–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.80 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 1911:15:03marker 2026-09-19T11:15:03.013Z0.80→0.80no changetightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.58–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.80 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 1911:15:02marker 2026-09-19T11:15:02.965Z0.80→0.80no changetightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.58–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.80 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 1911:15:02marker 2026-09-19T11:15:02.964Z0.80→0.80no changetightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.58–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.80 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 1911:15:02marker 2026-09-19T11:15:02.963Z0.80→0.80no changetightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.58–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.80 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 1911:15:02marker 2026-09-19T11:15:02.890Z0.80→0.80no changetightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.58–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.80 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 1911:15:02marker 2026-09-19T11:15:02.884Z0.80→0.80no changetightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.58–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.80 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 1911:15:02marker 2026-09-19T11:15:02.883Z0.80→0.80no changetightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.58–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.80 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 1911:15:02marker 2026-09-19T11:15:02.849Z0.80→0.80no changetightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.58–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.80 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 1909:15:02marker 2026-09-19T09:15:02.165Z0.80→0.80no changetightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.58–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.80 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 1907:14:21marker 2026-09-19T07:14:21.863Z0.80→0.80no changetightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.58–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.80 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 1907:14:21marker 2026-09-19T07:14:21.090Z0.80→0.80no changetightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.58–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.80 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 1907:14:20marker 2026-09-19T07:14:20.971Z0.80→0.80no changetightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.58–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.80 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 1907:14:20marker 2026-09-19T07:14:20.895Z0.80→0.80no changetightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.58–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.80 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 1907:14:20marker 2026-09-19T07:14:20.856Z0.80→0.80no changetightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.58–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.80 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 1907:14:20marker 2026-09-19T07:14:20.800Z0.80→0.80no changetightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.58–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.80 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 1905:14:01marker 2026-09-19T05:14:01.459Z0.80→0.80no changetightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.58–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.80 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 1905:14:01marker 2026-09-19T05:14:01.453Z0.80→0.80no changetightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.58–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.80 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 1905:14:01marker 2026-09-19T05:14:01.452Z0.80→0.80no changetightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.58–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.80 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 1903:14:01marker 2026-09-19T03:14:01.052Z0.80→0.80no changetightenn=156 · hit 57.7% · Brier 0.352 · band 0.58–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.80 — Brier 0.352 no better than a coin flip (n=156)
- Sep 1901:13:26marker 2026-09-19T01:13:26.218Z0.80→0.80no changetightenn=153 · hit 58.2% · Brier 0.346 · band 0.58–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.80 — Brier 0.346 no better than a coin flip (n=153)
- Sep 1901:13:26marker 2026-09-19T01:13:26.200Z0.80→0.80no changetightenn=153 · hit 58.2% · Brier 0.346 · band 0.58–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.80 — Brier 0.346 no better than a coin flip (n=153)
- Sep 1901:13:26marker 2026-09-19T01:13:26.189Z0.80→0.80no changetightenn=153 · hit 58.2% · Brier 0.346 · band 0.58–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.80 — Brier 0.346 no better than a coin flip (n=153)
- Sep 1901:13:26marker 2026-09-19T01:13:26.174Z0.80→0.80no changetightenn=153 · hit 58.2% · Brier 0.346 · band 0.58–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.80 — Brier 0.346 no better than a coin flip (n=153)
- Sep 1901:13:26marker 2026-09-19T01:13:26.171Z0.80→0.80no changetightenn=153 · hit 58.2% · Brier 0.346 · band 0.58–0.80 · target 60%
tightening to 0.80 — Brier 0.346 no better than a coin flip (n=153)
SIGNAL WEIGHT vs REALIZED EDGE
min sample 10| Signal | Weight | Influence | Top-3 rate | n | Hit rate | P&L / call | Suggested | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liq Skew | 0.25 | 47% | 100% | 168 | 63% | +400.9 | 0.16 | OVER-WEIGHTED |
| OB Imbalance | 0.25 | 38% | 100% | 197 | 61% | +290.0 | 0.12 | OVER-WEIGHTED |
| CVD 5m | 0.25 | 15% | 100% | 191 | 63% | +481.7 | 0.20 | CALIBRATED |
| DVOL Regimeoff | 0.25 | 0% | 0% | 50 | 70% | +776.6 | 0.32 | UNDER-WEIGHTED |
| VWAP Deviationoff | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 13 | 69% | +256.2 | 0.10 | UNDER-WEIGHTED |
| Funding Zoff | 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 40 | 78% | +1473.4 | 1.21 | UNDER-WEIGHTED |
| AI Sentimentoff | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0 | — | — | — | NEED DATA |
| OI Δ 15moff | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 68 | 59% | -44.6 | 0.10 | UNDER-WEIGHTED |
| Options Skewoff | 0.25 | 0% | 0% | 70 | 70% | +1353.0 | 0.55 | UNDER-WEIGHTED |
| Price Stretchoff | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0 | — | — | — | NEED DATA |
| Basis Momentumoff | 0.25 | 0% | 0% | 64 | 69% | +785.7 | 0.32 | UNDER-WEIGHTED |
| Price Momentumoff | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 13 | 69% | +256.2 | 0.10 | UNDER-WEIGHTED |
| Strike Distance σoff | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 13 | 69% | +256.2 | 0.10 | UNDER-WEIGHTED |
| Funding Divergenceoff | 0.25 | 0% | 0% | 64 | 69% | +1030.7 | 0.42 | UNDER-WEIGHTED |
| Tx Momentumoff | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 4 | 75% | +1349.8 | — | NEED DATA |
| Fee Pressureoff | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 4 | 75% | +1349.8 | — | NEED DATA |
| Mempool Growthoff | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1 | 100% | +7772.7 | — | NEED DATA |
REGIME BREAKDOWN · TREND vs CHOP
split |score|×agree 2.77 · trend 110 · chop 110 · 2 regime conflicts| Signal | Trend | Chop | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | Hit | P&L | Verdict | n | Hit | P&L | Verdict | |
| OB Imbalance | 95 | 60% | +9.9 | OVER | 102 | 63% | +550.9 | OVER |
| CVD 5m | 97 | 64% | +652.5 | OVER | 94 | 62% | +305.5 | OVER |
| Liq Skew | 87 | 59% | -327.0 | OVER | 81 | 67% | +1182.7 | OVER |
| Options Skew⚠ regime split | 52 | 71% | +1524.3 | UNDER | 18 | 67% | +858.2 | OVER |
| OI Δ 15m | 42 | 67% | +1444.3 | UNDER | 26 | 46% | -2449.6 | UNDER |
| Basis Momentum | 50 | 74% | +1427.9 | UNDER | 14 | 50% | -1507.8 | UNDER |
| Funding Divergence⚠ regime split | 47 | 70% | +1172.9 | UNDER | 17 | 65% | +637.6 | OVER |
| DVOL Regime | 40 | 73% | +1310.8 | UNDER | 10 | 60% | -1360.2 | UNDER |
| Funding Z | 33 | 76% | +1117.0 | OK | 7 | 86% | +3153.2 | n/a |
| VWAP Deviation | 8 | 88% | +3357.0 | n/a | 5 | 40% | -4704.9 | n/a |
| Price Momentum | 8 | 88% | +3357.0 | n/a | 5 | 40% | -4704.9 | n/a |
| Strike Distance σ | 8 | 88% | +3357.0 | n/a | 5 | 40% | -4704.9 | n/a |
| Tx Momentum | 3 | 67% | +260.5 | n/a | 1 | 100% | +4617.8 | n/a |
| Fee Pressure | 3 | 67% | +260.5 | n/a | 1 | 100% | +4617.8 | n/a |
| Mempool Growth | 1 | 100% | +7772.7 | n/a | 0 | — | — | n/a |
| AI Sentiment | 0 | — | — | n/a | 0 | — | — | n/a |
| Price Stretch | 0 | — | — | n/a | 0 | — | — | n/a |
Trend = resolved calls whose |score| × agreement sat at or above the sample median; chop = below. Suggested weights are recomputed inside each regime, so a signal can be under-weighted in trend and over-weighted in chop. Minimum sample per cell: 10.
CONTRIBUTION DRIFT DETECTION
120 ticks · 4 segments · split 09:17:04 · min n 82 signals drifting persistently. DIVERGENT rows mean the ranking is moving the opposite way from realized edge.
| Signal | Trend | Share early→late | Rank | Persistence | P&L early→late | Hit early→late | n | Correlation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OB Imbalance Not enough resolved calls to correlate drift with outcomes. | RISING | 27.6% → 42.6%(+14.9pp) | #2 → #2 | 66.7% | +290.0 → — | 61% → — | 197/0 | n/a |
Liq Skew Not enough resolved calls to correlate drift with outcomes. | FALLING | 56.3% → 42.9%(-13.4pp) | #1 → #1 | 100.0% | +400.9 → — | 63% → — | 168/0 | n/a |
CVD 5m Not enough resolved calls to correlate drift with outcomes. | STABLE | 16.1% → 14.6%(-1.5pp) | #3 → #3 | 33.3% | +481.7 → — | 63% → — | 191/0 | n/a |
DVOL Regime Not enough resolved calls to correlate drift with outcomes. | STABLE | 0.0% → 0.0%(+0.0pp) | #— → #— | 0.0% | +776.6 → — | 70% → — | 50/0 | n/a |
VWAP Deviation Not enough resolved calls to correlate drift with outcomes. | STABLE | 0.0% → 0.0%(+0.0pp) | #— → #— | 0.0% | +256.2 → — | 69% → — | 13/0 | n/a |
Funding Z Not enough resolved calls to correlate drift with outcomes. | STABLE | 0.0% → 0.0%(+0.0pp) | #— → #— | 0.0% | +1473.4 → — | 78% → — | 40/0 | n/a |
AI Sentiment Not enough resolved calls to correlate drift with outcomes. | STABLE | 0.0% → 0.0%(+0.0pp) | #— → #— | 0.0% | — → — | — → — | 0/0 | n/a |
OI Δ 15m Not enough resolved calls to correlate drift with outcomes. | STABLE | 0.0% → 0.0%(+0.0pp) | #— → #— | 0.0% | -44.6 → — | 59% → — | 68/0 | n/a |
Options Skew Not enough resolved calls to correlate drift with outcomes. | STABLE | 0.0% → 0.0%(+0.0pp) | #— → #— | 0.0% | +1353.0 → — | 70% → — | 70/0 | n/a |
Price Stretch Not enough resolved calls to correlate drift with outcomes. | STABLE | 0.0% → 0.0%(+0.0pp) | #— → #— | 0.0% | — → — | — → — | 0/0 | n/a |
Basis Momentum Not enough resolved calls to correlate drift with outcomes. | STABLE | 0.0% → 0.0%(+0.0pp) | #— → #— | 0.0% | +785.7 → — | 69% → — | 64/0 | n/a |
Price Momentum Not enough resolved calls to correlate drift with outcomes. | STABLE | 0.0% → 0.0%(+0.0pp) | #— → #— | 0.0% | +256.2 → — | 69% → — | 13/0 | n/a |
Strike Distance σ Not enough resolved calls to correlate drift with outcomes. | STABLE | 0.0% → 0.0%(+0.0pp) | #— → #— | 0.0% | +256.2 → — | 69% → — | 13/0 | n/a |
Funding Divergence Not enough resolved calls to correlate drift with outcomes. | STABLE | 0.0% → 0.0%(+0.0pp) | #— → #— | 0.0% | +1030.7 → — | 69% → — | 64/0 | n/a |
Tx Momentum Not enough resolved calls to correlate drift with outcomes. | STABLE | 0.0% → 0.0%(+0.0pp) | #— → #— | 0.0% | +1349.8 → — | 75% → — | 4/0 | n/a |
Fee Pressure Not enough resolved calls to correlate drift with outcomes. | STABLE | 0.0% → 0.0%(+0.0pp) | #— → #— | 0.0% | +1349.8 → — | 75% → — | 4/0 | n/a |
Mempool Growth Not enough resolved calls to correlate drift with outcomes. | STABLE | 0.0% → 0.0%(+0.0pp) | #— → #— | 0.0% | +7772.7 → — | 100% → — | 1/0 | n/a |
AUDIT HISTORY TIMELINE
TOP CONTRIBUTORS PER TICK
- 09:17:20STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:20STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:20STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:20STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:19STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:19STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:19STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:19STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:18STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:18STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:18STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:18STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:17STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:17STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:17STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:17STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:16STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:16STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:16STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:16STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:16STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:15STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:15STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:14STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:14STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:14STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:14STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:13STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:13STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)
- 09:17:13STAND DOWNs -0.23 · c 0.00Liq Skew -0.17OB Imbalance -0.16CVD 5m -0.06|score|=0.23 < 2; agreement 0 < 3; volume 0 below 100 (book too thin to exit)